Key Points
- The primary privacy-related lawsuit against Life360, a 2023 class action alleging unauthorized sale of user location data, was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in November 2023 and is no longer active.
- A more recent development involves Life360’s implication in a 2025 lawsuit filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton against Allstate and its subsidiary Arity, alleging unlawful collection and sale of driving and location data through apps including Life360—without proper notice or consent.
- These cases highlight ongoing concerns about location privacy in mobile apps, but no active class action lawsuit directly targets Life360 for privacy violations as of early 2026.
- Users may have options for individual claims through arbitration, depending on app terms, and should review privacy settings to limit data sharing.
Why This Matters Now Location data from apps like Life360 can reveal highly personal information, such as visits to medical facilities, places of worship, or daily routines. When collected or shared without clear consent, it raises risks of privacy invasion, potential discrimination, or use in insurance pricing. The Texas lawsuit, filed under the state’s Data Privacy and Security Act (TDPSA), marks one of the first major enforcements of comprehensive state privacy laws and could influence national standards.
Who Is Impacted Primarily Life360 users (over 50 million globally) who granted location permissions, especially those in Texas or other states with strong privacy laws. Families using the app for safety tracking may be particularly concerned about children’s data.
Disclaimer This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for personal guidance.
Life360 is a popular family safety and location-sharing app used by millions to track family members in real time. Features like crash detection, location history, and driving reports provide peace of mind for parents and caregivers. However, the app’s data practices have drawn scrutiny, particularly around the collection, use, and sharing of precise location and driving behavior data.
Background and Legal Context
Location data privacy has become a focal point in U.S. consumer protection law. Federal law, including Section 5 of the FTC Act, prohibits unfair or deceptive practices, while state laws like California’s CCPA and Texas’s TDPSA require clear notice and consent for processing sensitive data such as precise geolocation.
In late 2021, investigative reporting by The Markup revealed that Life360 was selling precise location data from millions of users—including children and families—to data brokers. The company reportedly earned significant revenue from these sales, with data sometimes reaching sensitive locations (e.g., reproductive health clinics or addiction recovery centers). Life360 responded by announcing in early 2022 that it would cease selling precise location data to third-party brokers and emphasized user transparency and opt-out options.
This reporting prompted a class action lawsuit filed in January 2023 by a minor plaintiff (E.S.) and his family in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Case No. 3:23-cv-00168). The complaint alleged unjust enrichment, claiming Life360 sold geolocation data without consent, violating privacy expectations and potentially causing harm through de-anonymization or misuse. The suit sought damages, restitution, and injunctive relief on behalf of affected U.S. users.
The case was voluntarily dismissed with prejudice in November 2023, meaning it cannot be refiled on the same grounds. No settlement details were publicly disclosed, and the dismissal ended that specific class action effort.
Key Legal Issues Explained
The core issues revolve around consent, transparency, and the sensitivity of location data:
- Consent Requirements: Under state privacy laws like the TDPSA, companies must provide clear notice and obtain informed consent before collecting or selling sensitive data such as precise geolocation.
- Unjust Enrichment: Plaintiffs argued that Life360 profited from user data without providing corresponding benefits or disclosure, enriching itself at users’ expense.
- Data Anonymization and Risks: Even “anonymized” data can often be re-identified, potentially exposing users to stigma, discrimination, or safety risks.
- Third-Party Sharing: Partnerships with data aggregators or insurers raise questions about oversight and whether users were adequately informed.
These principles draw from established precedents in consumer privacy litigation, where courts scrutinize whether app permissions truly inform users of data practices.
Latest Developments and Case Status
In January 2025, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a lawsuit against Allstate and its subsidiary Arity (Case details in Texas state court). The suit alleges that Arity embedded tracking software in mobile apps—including Life360, GasBuddy, and others—to collect trillions of miles of driving and location data from over 45 million consumers without proper notice or consent. This data was used to build a driving behavior database sold to insurers, potentially affecting premiums.
Life360 is not a direct defendant but is explicitly named as an app involved in the alleged scheme. The case invokes the TDPSA and represents the first enforcement action under Texas’s comprehensive privacy law. As of early 2026, the lawsuit remains ongoing with no reported resolution.
Law firms, such as Keller Rohrback and Labaton Sucharow, are investigating potential individual arbitration claims against Life360 related to the Arity integration. These arise from app terms requiring arbitration instead of class actions.
Who Is Affected and Potential Impact
- Affected Users: Anyone who used Life360 and granted location access, particularly in Texas or states with similar laws. Families tracking minors may face heightened concerns.
- Potential Consequences: Unauthorized data use could lead to higher insurance rates based on driving scores or privacy harms from data exposure. If the Texas case succeeds, it could result in penalties for involved parties and changes to data practices.
What This Means Going Forward
These developments underscore the evolving landscape of mobile app privacy. Companies like Life360 must balance safety features with compliance, while regulators increasingly enforce consent rules. The Texas lawsuit could set precedents for how apps handle third-party data sharing.
Users should:
- Review Life360’s privacy settings and terms of service (last updated December 2025).
- Consider limiting location sharing or using alternatives.
- Monitor for updates on the Texas case or any new filings.
Conclusion
Privacy claims against Life360 highlight broader challenges in balancing app utility with data protection. While the 2023 class action concluded without relief, the 2025 Texas enforcement action keeps these issues in focus. Staying informed about app policies and legal developments remains essential for users concerned about location privacy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Was there a class action lawsuit against Life360 for selling location data?
Yes, a 2023 class action (E.S. v. Life360 Inc.) alleged unauthorized data sales. It was dismissed with prejudice in November 2023 and is no longer active.
Is Life360 currently facing a privacy lawsuit?
No direct lawsuit against Life360 exists, but it is implicated in the ongoing 2025 Texas AG v. Allstate/Arity case over data collection practices.
Can affected users file claims?
Some may pursue individual arbitration through Life360’s terms. Contacting a law firm for evaluation is advisable.
Did Life360 stop selling location data?
The company announced in 2022 it would end sales of precise location data to brokers and emphasizes user controls.
How can I protect my privacy on Life360?
Adjust app permissions, disable unnecessary tracking, and regularly review data sharing options.
You May Also Like: Life360 Class Action Lawsuit: What You Need to Know

